Taste of the Wild alternatives, scored.

Here is the thing nobody tells you about the famous bison bag: High Prairie is currently the lowest-scoring recipe in Taste of the Wild’s own lineup on our rubric, at about 6.9. Five of its shelf-mates beat it, and so does a long list of other brands’ recipes that skip chicken the same way. Both lists below, ranked.

Hub pageLast reviewed 2026-07-14

Where High Prairie actually lands.

The parts that work: Value is genuinely strong at 8 of 10 (about 62% of the boutique premium median per 1,000 kcal, at $58.99 for 28 lb), Ingredient Clarity is a clean 7 with named proteins and an explicitly named preservative, and Sensitivity Risk sits at 8.5. This is a reasonably priced, honestly labeled food.

What holds it back is Nutrition Fit at 6: protein runs about 35.6% dry matter, just past the 22.5 to 35% band our all-life-stages model credits, so it misses range credit that in-band recipes collect, and its formulated-to-meet AAFCO statement earns less than feeding-trial language would. Brand Trust sits at 6.2 per our current record. None of that is a scandal. It just means the famous bag is beatable, starting inside its own brand: Sierra Mountain Roasted Lamb scores 7.6, Pacific Stream 7.4, Southwest Canyon 7.3, PREY Angus Beef 7.2, and Ancient Prairie 7.1 all outscore the flagship.

On recalls, we don’t score rumors; the sourced position lives on the Taste of the Wild recall page and in our recall index.

The brand’s own lineup, ranked.

Every Taste of the Wild recipe we score, best first. The famous one is last.

TASTE OF THE WILDTHigh Prairie Canine RecipeKIBBLE6.9SAMPLE PLACEHOLDER

Taste of the Wild

High Prairie Canine Recipe with Roasted Bison & Roasted Venison

6.9

$1.25 / 1,000 kcal · 38% below median

Manufacturer source supports ingredients, GA, calories, and adult maintenance AAFCO language. Watch-outs are multiple animal protein families, pea-family ingredients high on the label, high dry-matter protein just above the adult-maintenance rubric range, partial Brand Trust, and historical Diamond/Taste recall context.

Dry dog foodMixedPartially verified
Retailer-sourcedRegulatory historyWarning gap
Buy on Amazon

Alternatives that match or beat it, ranked.

Filter: non-TOTW dog recipes without our chicken sensitivity flag, scoring at or above High Prairie. Rank: composite score, one recipe per brand.

Independent. PetScored may earn a commission on purchases through tagged links at no extra cost to you. Affiliate revenue does not affect any score on this page. Affiliate disclosure ›

PURINA PRO PLANPSensitive Skin & Stomach SKIBBLE8.0SAMPLE PLACEHOLDER

Purina Pro Plan

Sensitive Skin & Stomach Salmon & Rice

8.0

$1.46 / 1,000 kcal · 46% above median

Source-backed adult maintenance dry food with salmon first, specific grains, and AAFCO feeding-test language. Main watch-outs are fish/beef-fat sensitivity flags, natural flavor, partial Brand Trust, and a recent brand-level Purina Pro Plan Veterinary Diets wet dog food mislabeling recall that remains disclosed.

Dry dog foodGoodPartially verified
Retailer-sourcedRegulatory historyWarning gap
Buy on Amazon
BLUE BUFFALOBBasics Skin & Stomach CareKIBBLE7.9SAMPLE PLACEHOLDER

Blue Buffalo

Basics Skin & Stomach Care Adult Salmon & Potato Recipe

7.9

$1.98 / 1,000 kcal · 10% below median

Limited-ingredient-positioned dry food with salmon first, official product identity, and retailer-controlled GA/calorie fields. Watch-outs are formal AAFCO text not captured, pea-family ingredients, natural flavor, partial Brand Trust, and price freshness.

Dry dog foodGoodPartially verified
Retailer-sourcedAAFCO gapRegulatory history
Buy on Amazon
NATURAL BALANCENLimited Ingredient Salmon KIBBLE7.6SAMPLE PLACEHOLDER

Natural Balance

Limited Ingredient Salmon & Brown Rice Recipe

7.6

$1.89 / 1,000 kcal · 14% below median

Manufacturer and retailer sources support salmon as the first ingredient, adult maintenance AAFCO language, calcium/phosphorus, and calorie data. Limited-ingredient marketing is not scored separately from the actual label, and the 2021 Natural Balance dry cat-food Salmonella recall is disclosed as brand-level regulatory history, not a defect in this scored dog food SKU.

Limited ingredient dry dog foodGoodPartially verified
Retailer-sourcedRegulatory historyWarning gap
Buy on Amazon
OPEN FARMOWild-Caught Salmon & AncieKIBBLE7.6SAMPLE PLACEHOLDER

Open Farm

Wild-Caught Salmon & Ancient Grains Dog Kibble

7.6

$2.38 / 1,000 kcal · 19% above median

Public-beta scorecard with official Open Farm product page and nutrient profile PDF support for ingredients, GA, calories, AAFCO all-life-stages wording, and complete nutrient details. Watch-outs are partial Brand Trust, co-manufacturing context, refreshable retailer price, no-Class-I-ever still unknown, and no medical recommendation or verified-status claim.

Dry dog foodGoodPartially verified
Retailer-sourced
Buy on Amazon

The value case, specifically.

The strongest play here is the manufacturer’s own sibling. Diamond Naturals Skin & Coat Salmon & Potato scores 7.9, a full point above High Prairie, comes from the same manufacturer per our brand record (Diamond Pet Foods), and sits at a mass-premium price. We ran it head-to-head in Taste of the Wild vs Diamond Naturals. If the draw was novel protein, Canidae PURE Salmon (7.8) and Zignature Trout & Salmon (7.6) keep chicken off the label at similar money, and Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach Salmon tops the list at 8.0.

If you are leaving over the grain-free question, read why we don’t credit grain-free first; the short version is that we score it neither way. See also the wilderness-shelf head-to-head Taste of the Wild vs Blue Wilderness, our limited-ingredient picks, or the full scored set on the dog food hub.

Common questions.

FAQ

Frequently asked

Is Taste of the Wild a good dog food?

In our view it is a solid mid-pack food with one surprise inside. High Prairie, the bison-and-venison flagship most people buy, scores about 6.9: strong Value at 8 (roughly 62% of the boutique premium median per 1,000 kcal), clean Ingredient Clarity at 7, but a Nutrition Fit of 6 because its protein runs about 35.6% dry matter, just above the band our all-life-stages model credits. The surprise is that five of the brand's own recipes outscore the flagship, topped by Sierra Mountain Roasted Lamb at 7.6.

What is the best Taste of the Wild recipe by score?

On the current catalog: Sierra Mountain Roasted Lamb 7.6, Pacific Stream Smoked Salmon 7.4, Southwest Canyon 7.3, PREY Angus Beef 7.2, Ancient Prairie 7.1, Wetlands 7.0, and then High Prairie itself at 6.9. If you like the brand, the cheapest upgrade is not switching brands at all; it is picking a different bag off the same shelf.

What outscores Taste of the Wild from other brands?

Keeping to recipes our sensitivity model does not flag for chicken, since novel-protein feeding is usually why people shop this brand: Purina Pro Plan Sensitive Skin & Stomach Salmon & Rice reaches 8.0, Blue Buffalo Basics Salmon & Potato and Diamond Naturals Skin & Coat Salmon & Potato 7.9, and Canidae PURE Salmon 7.8. The ranked list below is drawn live from the catalog, one recipe per brand.

Who makes Taste of the Wild?

Diamond Pet Foods (Schell & Kampeter), per our brand record. That means Taste of the Wild and Diamond Naturals come from the same manufacturer, which is worth knowing when you compare prices: Diamond Naturals Skin & Coat scores 7.9 at a mass-premium price. We ran that head-to-head in the comparison linked below.

What about grain-free and heart disease (DCM)?

Most Taste of the Wild recipes are grain-free. The FDA investigation into a possible association between certain grain-free diets and dilated cardiomyopathy never confirmed that grain-free food causes it, and the inquiry was effectively wound down by 2022, so we treat the question as still open and score it neither way. Our longer take is in the grain-free editorial linked below.

Has Taste of the Wild been recalled?

We do not score rumors or secondhand lists. Any recall we factor into a score is matched against FDA enforcement records, and the current, sourced position lives on the brand's recall page and in our recall index rather than asserted here from memory.