Taste of the Wild
High Prairie Canine Recipe with Roasted Bison & Roasted Venison
Leads on Brand Trust
Buy on AmazonComparison · PetScored desk
Side-by-side pages should help you weigh tradeoffs, not crown a vague winner.
Independent. PetScored may earn a commission on purchases through tagged links at no extra cost to you. Affiliate revenue does not affect any score on this page. Affiliate disclosure ›
Taste of the Wild
Leads on Brand Trust
Buy on AmazonDiamond Naturals edges Taste of the Wild by 0.8 on composite.
+0.8 composite
Diamond Naturals
Leads on PetScored rating, Nutrition Fit, Sensitivity Risk
Buy on AmazonOur read
Two recipes from the same maker, Diamond, and the cheaper one wins: in our view Diamond Naturals outscores Taste of the Wild on nutrition fit and value, with a hair more sensitivity-risk margin, while Taste of the Wild's grain-free positioning buys it nothing on our rubric. They tie on ingredient clarity.
This verdict is our opinion under the PetScored rubric, not veterinary advice. The exact sub-scores are in the table below; each food’s source confidence and limitations stay on its own scorecard.
Taste of the Wild
Manufacturer source supports ingredients, GA, calories, and adult maintenance AAFCO language. Watch-outs are multiple animal protein families, pea-family ingredients high on the label, high dry-matter protein just above the adult-maintenance rubric range, partial Brand Trust, and historical Diamond/Taste recall context.
Diamond Naturals
A value-priced all-life-stages kibble led by named chicken and chicken meal with whole grains and salmon oil for DHA. The price per calorie is among the lowest in the catalog; Diamond's manufacturing history (2005 and 2012 recalls) is the main reason Brand Trust isn't higher.
Comparison scores use the same reconstructed score-event math as the product pages. Source confidence, unresolved gaps, recall context, and warning-letter limitations remain attached to each individual scorecard.