Editorial · PetScored desk · June 10, 2026
Do hairball remedies work for cats?
The hairball aisle has two traditions. One is a tube of malt-flavored petroleum jelly that cats have been licking for decades. The other is fiber. Only one of them has been tested in cats, and it is not the one most people reach for.
What a hairball actually is
A hairball is a trichobezoar: a wad of swallowed hair that did not pass through the gut and gets vomited back up. Cats groom constantly, so some hair-swallowing is normal. The goal of a hairball remedy is to move that hair through the digestive tract and out the back end instead of up the front. There are two ways to attempt that, and they rest on very different amounts of evidence.
The case for fiber
Fiber is the approach with actual trials behind it. Loureiro and colleagues ran a randomized study and found that sugarcane fiber produced a dose-dependent reduction in trichobezoar excretion, while plain cellulose did not, which tells you the effect is specific to the type of fiber rather than just bulk (Loureiro 2014, PMID 26101589). Weber and colleagues then ran a controlled crossover study and found that psyllium combined with higher dietary fiber increased fecal hair excretion in long-haired cats by roughly 81 to 113 percent compared with a low-fiber diet (Weber 2015, PMID 29067172). More hair leaving in the stool is less hair available to come back up as a hairball.
Two honest caveats keep this from being a miracle. The studies measured fecal hair, a surrogate for hairballs rather than a direct count of vomited ones, and the clearest effect was in long-haired cats, who have the most hair to move. The effect is real, and it is modest.
The case against the gel
The petroleum-jelly lubricant gel is the older tradition, and it is the one the evidence cannot vouch for. A peer-reviewed review of feline hairballs concluded that no studies have evaluated the commonly recommended preventive strategies, the malt and petroleum-jelly gels included (Cannon 2013, PMID 23254238). The lubricant mechanism, that a slick gut lets hair slide through, is reasonable, and the product is low-risk. But reasonable-and-low-risk is not the same as tested, and after decades on the shelf there is still no controlled trial showing the gels reduce hairballs in cats.
What the same review flags
The Cannon review adds a caution worth more than any product recommendation: frequent hairballs, especially in a short-haired cat, can be a sign of an underlying skin or gastrointestinal problem rather than a grooming nuisance. Over-grooming from itchy skin puts more hair in the gut; a gut motility problem keeps it there. If a cat is bringing up hairballs often, the highest-value move is a veterinary look for a cause, not a bigger scoop of gel.
How the two score
On our hairball list this comes out exactly as the evidence would predict. A psyllium-based fiber capsule sits on the one approach with controlled trials, so its Evidence Quality score is the best in the category, and it lands in our Mixed band. It does not climb higher because the trials raised total dietary fiber to 11 to 15 percent of the diet, and a single small capsule is far less than that, so we cannot confirm a daily dose delivers a studied-effective amount, and we flag its value as approximate. The traditional petroleum-jelly gel scores below it, in our lowest band, because its Evidence Quality rests on tradition rather than a trial and its “eliminate and prevent” claim runs ahead of what the evidence shows.
The unglamorous footnote is that the most effective hairball tool needs no product at all: regular brushing removes loose hair before the cat swallows it. Fiber is the evidence-backed supplement; the gel is the tradition; and a cat with frequent hairballs deserves a vet visit before either.
- The PetScored desk. See how we tier evidence in the supplements methodology, and the scored hairball products on the Vetasyl and Laxatone scorecards.